let's talk 306-530-6566
SM Solutions
  • Home
  • Welcome
  • About
  • Services
    • Strategic Organizational Alignment
    • Governance that Mobilizes
    • Business and Operational Planning and Implementation
    • Understanding and Sustaining Corporate Culture
    • Performance and Personal Realization
    • Organizational Positioning in Digital World
    • Environmental Footprint Management >
      • Economic Prosperity – Going Green and Making Money
      • Environmental Integrity – Going Green and Saving Money
      • Social Responsibility
    • Sustainable Health & Safety
  • Our Clients/Partners
  • Contact

The Good News – There are no Enemies, The Bad News – There is no Plan B

10/26/2015

1 Comment

 
I recently listened to President Obama’s speech covering his intentions towards reducing carbon emissions throughout the United States.  When he thoughtfully expressed the notion that we must do something because there is no Plan B, it gave me pause to reflect on what that phrase really meant.  Specifically, if there is no Plan B, then what the heck is Plan A??  If Plan A is unsustainable then it must be stopped, we can no longer continue as it will bring us nothing but planetary ruin…  (I know a little over the top, but I need to keep your attention. : )  

Not knowing specifically what Plan A is, I needed to do some assuming.  My assumption is that a carbon consuming economy is not sustainable for the planet and that to sustain the mother ship we need to reduce our consumption of these types of products and find alternative ways to feed our current carbon hungry economies.
 
If this assumption is somewhat accurate, then logically we need to determine how we got to this point in the first place, and what is the motivating factor(s) supporting our current condition.  Not knowing this, would not allow us to achieve nor sustain an alternative approach.  As a Business Consultant I know all too well that setting goals without understanding the current motivations that inspire status quo behaviour will result in existing norms undermining the achievement of new expectations.  

A good example of this was demonstrated when North America encouraged immigrants to migrate to the Northern Great Plains.  They came with vision and hope for a new future, claimed land parcels throughout the western US and Canada and began a new life.  Within two decades the Northern Great Plains became unlivable.   Water was scarce, the land was parched, the wind blew hard and the air became filled with dirt.  Hard working and very well intending farm families abandoned their homesteads as landscapes became unsustainable.  Their visions and hope gave way to an overwhelming crisis and the reality that an ecosystem that had sustained flora and fauna for thousands of years prior to the twentieth century was now in peril.  Simply put, the agricultural practices and competencies that immigrants brought with them from various European countries were not conducive to the Northern Great Plains.  Agricultural practices that included deep tilling on a landscape that is prone to more extreme variations in climate were not sustainable.   Farm families, governments and business needed to work together and rethink Plan A and what sustainability could be given the Northern Great Plains conditions.  Their cooperative efforts introduced new methods of planting such as low till technology, better water management systems that could support seasonal flows over an annual basis, the introduction of shelterbelts and the research and development of new and hardier varieties of grains and oilseeds.  A better Plan A emerged as they discovered a change in their collective perspective with a cooperative openness to adopt alternative methods resulted in the Northern Great Plains becoming the bread basket for the world.   

Now, back to our current Plan A. It is about feeding a society that is preoccupied with the growing use of carbon based products.  So if we are not eating the stuff, we must be using it to feed the things we want.  So what would those things be?  More cheap and accessible consumer goods – check; more plastic products – check; more freedom to travel anywhere at any time – check; more productive agricultural products and greener lawns, golf courses and green spaces– check; and many more on the list that justify existing behavior (I would list them, but this is a blog not a book. : )

So Plan A exists because we want it too.  It isn’t because big chemical companies, oil and gas producers and/or refineries or shippers and pipelines want to be cast as the villain in a story plot that places them in some Hollywood conspiracy film.  They are developing products and services that are inspired by us and provide specific investment returns to their shareholders. This is what we and the laws governing their existence require of them, no more and no less.  They are no more villains or enemies of the state than the people that purchase their products and/or use their services.  So Plan A is a deliberate result of us wanting what we want when we want it…   (Shoot, I hate when I include myself in the concern.  : )

So if there are no enemies, and we alone are the custodians of the existing Plan A, then what do we need to consider changing, given there is no Plan B.  Like the Northern Great Plains example, their Plan A was to populate a vast ecosystem with agricultural producers to take advantage of its potential prosperity.  There was no Plan B as they could not move the ecosystem and mass migration to another location on this planet or any other for that matter would have been extremely problematic.  So they needed to rethink their Plan A.  This required a realization by the many that the current practices were not sustainable and a cooperative and collaborative call to transitional action.  

Many economists say that we are all dead in the long term, and if this is true, then continuing with the vigilant pursuit of Plan A becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.   We might say that we need to act now as if our lives depend on it.  (Threw that in just cause it really adds to the drama. : )

If Plan A is really just us, then we need to challenge our existing behaviors and expectations. There is a need to introduce the longer term impacts of what we want now, with what we will need in the future.  Alternative products and services, ones that are less carbon reliant, more sustainable and considerate to the air, water and soil we depend on need time and consideration to prove their effectiveness.  Trials need to also consider organizational norms and competencies and allow for transition. There is no silver bullet solution; this is complexity at its best.  

If we were the Board of Directors for an organization or business called Mother Earth our shareholders would expect that we developed methods and means to protect our current cash flow and maintain overall operations, while also prudently investing in those things that advanced our organizational interests and created future cash flows.  Our business existence depends on living now, but also in creating a prosperous business position for tomorrow.   If Plan A is all we have, and Plan A is always our best plan (Plan B is the fall back or second choice) then we need to develop and sustain it in a manner that sees transformation and transition as a positive element, not something that is villainized.  We need to remember, there are No Enemies and there is no Plan B.  

To be continued and please share your thoughts as great things always start with a conversation…


1 Comment

Organizational Life - "A Body of Work"

11/14/2014

0 Comments

 
I recently made a presentation to a group of organizational managers regarding the elements of a sound Strategic Management Framework, an enabling Governance and Accountability Framework and the key requirement for them to be bound in an appropriately calibrated Values Based Framework. We were discussing these various frameworks that support the construct of an organization when one manager asked me if I could give an example of how these frameworks "come together" and support the effective achievement of an organizations overall intentions. It provoked me to think about an appropriate metaphor that would ably exemplify the intimate working relationships and interdependence of these frameworks. What came to mind was the construct of the Human Body.

When we think of the Strategic Management Framework, it is in line with the human body’s  Intellectual capacity to think, plan, predetermine and evaluate its various options and intentions. Our brain takes in information, examines various possibilities, determines specific risk factors, assesses resource requirements and limits choices to those that create the greatest opportunity with the lowest level of risk. Though this in itself is an amazing human capacity, much like a well-intended strategic or operational plan, it is not the sufficient condition to actualize any specific actions and/or results. The human body’s Intellectual capacity requires mobilization. This mobilization comes from the human body’s ability to connect good intellectual intentions with those Physical body parts that can create actions that realize results.

Much like the Governance Framework of any organization, the Physical body responds to priorities that are identified and ensures that actions are consistent with those requirements. The Physical body also sweeps in additional information as it progresses, feeding the Intellectual body with insights, that allow for mutual and interactive adjustments along the way. It also has limitations in its ability to achieve certain things, requires rest, nurturing and reinforcement, and it has overall capacity restrictions. This again is somewhat amazing, yet still not the satisfying condition for overall success. The human body’s Intellectual ability to plan intentions complemented by its Physical ability to mobilize action still requires consideration from the third, and likely most inspirational part of the body, that being it's Spirit.

 The Spiritual body engages the emotional state of mind and the "how it feels to do it" and "am I inspired to engage in it" components. These are critical aspects when we are carrying out the greatest intentions of the Intellectual and Physical aspects of the body. The Spirit creates purpose and establishes fulfillment, it defines our sense of meaning and being and drives our emotional responses and inspires our values. As with the Values Based Framework of an organization, simply getting it done is not the satisfying condition for the reasons as to why we are doing it at all. It must be meaningful, feel right and have a sense of purpose in order to motivate the right actions and garner the expected results.

Together, the Intellectual, Physical and Spiritual parts of the body, exemplify the necessary elements of a whole organization.... Literally, Organizational Life is A Body of Work... Just my thoughts and hope it encourages some discussion, cheers.
0 Comments

Leadership & Management

11/14/2014

1 Comment

 
I have pondered the relationship between Leadership and Management for many years now, and in conversation with colleagues I have come to realize that the relationship is murky at the best of time. Given the digital world we work in, and the speed in which we need to transact our business activity, creating clearer perspectives becomes challenging. I took some time recently and unplugged from my social media and put together my thoughts on how we can create a greater level of clarity on the relationship between Leadership & Management as it manifests itself from the Strategic Organizational level, right through to the Personal and Professional level.

If organizations and the people that populate them are premised on Managing their current business (or personal) activities in an effort to get things done, then, in the simplest of terms, Management is about maintaining our current position and protecting existing cash flows in an efficient and effective manner. While this is important, by itself it is not the sufficient condition, as organizations (and people as well) need to continually grow and advance their position in ever changing markets. As such, advancing our position requires that we examine things that could be, but are not yet being done. This requires Leadership activities that explore and assess alternatives and/or new ways and means for the organization (or self) in an effort to sustain or continually grow. Best advancement options can be refined, selected and then, at the right point, managed into the organization in an engaging manner.

So in the distillation of this, so that we can in a snap review what we are doing at any given time, we look at the relationship between Leadership & Management as: Leadership - Advancing Activities Management - Maintaining Activities. I have written a brief on this for those that would like a bit more detail (click to download the brief), but thought I would share these thoughts to see if others have an interest in discussing... Cheers.

1 Comment

    Carl N. Neggers

    Carl N. Neggers, Chief Executive Officer
    Carl brings over 30 years of strategic and sustainable management experience to the SM Solutions team. He has worked with federal and provincial ministries, the hospitality industry, accounting firms, professional sports franchises and environmental service companies helping to restructure and streamline their practices towards a more self-reliant, sustainable and profitable future.

    Carl has extensive international experience and also served as a lecturer at both the University of Regina and University of Guelph..

    Archives

    October 2015
    November 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

OUR SERVICES

Strategic Organizational Alignment

Governance that Mobilizes Strategic Intentions

Business and Operational Planning and Implementation

Understanding and Sustaining a Compelling Corporate Culture

Performance and Personal Realization

Organizational Positioning in a Digitally Networked World

Environmental Footprint Management

Sustainable Health & Safety
COMPANY

About Us

Contact Us

Our Clients / Partners
FOLLOW US

Twitter

Facebook

Linkedin
Picture
Let's meet. Let's talk!

Phone: 306-530-6566

Email: carl@sustainablemanagement.ca

Mailing address:
 3734 Currie Bay,
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 7C7